top of page
Care learner by penta-06.png

How to challenge a CQC report: a step-by-step guide for registered managers

If you believe your CQC report contains errors, you have three formal routes open to you: a factual accuracy challenge on the draft report (within 10 working days), a ratings review after publication (within 15 working days), and, in rare cases, judicial review. Each has a different purpose, a different deadline and a different standard of evidence. This guide walks through all three.

challenge a CQC report: a step-by-step guide for registered managers

Why this matters now

CQC has significantly increased its pace of inspection activity through 2025 and 2026, which means more providers are receiving draft and final reports than at any point in recent years. A report that goes unchallenged, even where it contains a factual error, becomes the version of record. It can shape commissioning decisions, feed into enforcement action, and follow your service into every future inspection. Knowing which route applies, and using it correctly, matters more than it used to.

How to challenge a CQC report: route one, the factual accuracy challenge

This is your first and most important opportunity. You have 10 working days from receiving the draft report to submit it.

After an inspection, CQC sends you a draft report before it's published. This is your chance to flag anything that's factually wrong or incomplete, not to argue with the inspector's professional judgement. The challenge is submitted through CQC's factual accuracy portal, using a link sent to the email address CQC holds for you, and is graded across three categories: typographical or numerical errors, information you believe is factually inaccurate, and additional information you think should have been included.

The critical rule here is evidence. Every point you raise must be supported by evidence that was actually available to inspectors at the time of the assessment visit. You can also submit evidence of action taken since the inspection, but be aware this won't change the judgement or score, only the narrative around it. If you disagree with an inspector's interpretation of the evidence rather than the evidence itself, that's a much harder challenge to win, and can be raised under the "factually inaccurate" category, but the odds are lower.

If you submit nothing, CQC treats the draft as accurate and complete, and publishes it as your final report. At that point, this route is closed permanently.

Access the CQC Readiness Assessment to check whether your evidence trail would stand up to a factual accuracy challenge before you ever need to submit one.

Route two: requesting a ratings review

Once the report is published, you have 15 working days to request a ratings review — but this is a narrower tool than most managers expect.

A ratings review is not a second chance to argue about the evidence or the judgement. It checks whether CQC followed its own published process correctly when awarding and aggregating your scores and ratings. You must state which specific rating or ratings you want reviewed and set out the grounds, within a 500-word limit. The review is carried out by CQC staff who weren't involved in your original inspection, with access to an independent reviewer where relevant.

You get one request per inspection report, so it needs to be right the first time. CQC aims to complete reviews within 50 working days, and the disputed rating stays live on your profile with a note that a review is under way while it's being considered.

What counts as valid grounds

Valid grounds are process failures: for example, that you weren't given the opportunity to submit factual accuracy comments, or that the scoring methodology wasn't correctly applied. Disagreement with the inspector's professional judgement is not valid grounds, however strongly you feel the rating is wrong.

Route three: formal complaints and judicial review

If significant inaccuracies remain after both of the above, or if you believe CQC failed in its statutory duties or acted unreasonably, a formal complaint to CQC or an application for judicial review are the remaining options. These focus on procedural fairness rather than re-scoring your service, are rare, and typically warrant specialist regulatory or legal advice given the cost and complexity involved. For most providers, a well-prepared factual accuracy challenge resolves the issue long before this stage is needed.

The mistake that undermines most challenges

Providers often treat the factual accuracy stage as optional, either because they doubt it will change anything or because they don't want to be seen as difficult. The opposite is usually true. Unchallenged inaccuracies don't disappear, they tend to resurface in future inspections, commissioning conversations and enforcement discussions, and become progressively harder to correct the longer they sit on the public record. A calm, evidence-led challenge at the draft stage is a routine, expected part of the process, not a confrontation.

Frequently asked questions

Can I challenge a CQC report after the 10-day deadline has passed?

No. The factual accuracy window is strictly enforced. Once it closes, your only remaining routes are a ratings review after publication or, in exceptional cases, judicial review.


Does challenging a report make CQC more likely to take a harder line with me in future?

No. A well-evidenced factual accuracy submission is a standard part of the process and expected by inspectors. Challenges based on disagreement rather than evidence are the ones that tend to go nowhere.


What evidence can I use in a factual accuracy challenge?

Only evidence that was available to inspectors at the time of the assessment visit will affect the judgement or scoring. You can also submit evidence of actions taken since the inspection, but this is recorded for context rather than used to change the rating.


Can a ratings review change my score?

Yes, but only where CQC finds it didn't correctly follow its own published process. It will not reconsider the underlying evidence or the inspector's judgement.


Do I need legal support to challenge a report?

Not usually for a factual accuracy challenge or a straightforward ratings review. Specialist advice becomes more valuable if you're considering a formal complaint or judicial review, given the cost and procedural complexity involved.

Verified external sources

Comments

bottom of page